Lets say they get rid of TJ via trade or whatever. Which one of these FA backs would you like to see brought in for a year or so while we groom a potential draft pick? Warrick Dunn DeShaun Foster Rudi Johnson Deuce McAllister Dominic Rhodes or none of them...they all blow.
So now instead of multiple Cutler threads we'll have multiple Thomas Jones threads- great! Why couldn't this be in the thread right above yours?
Oh jesus christ is it that big of a deal really? Why are there so many people on here that click on threads simply to make douchy comments. If you dont want to read another TJ thread dont click on it.
Dunn is a poor man's Leon at this point. Deuce and Rudi are done. I would take DeShaun or Rhodes on the cheap.
I agree. I don't see the big deal. It's so easy to ignore a thread you don't want to look at. I think its way more annoying to try and read a "redundant" thread and see 35 people whining about it. It's like a child that continually touches the hot burner without learning. They know its a redundant thread, they don't want to read it, yet they STILL click on it and then start crying when it is a 'redundant' thread. I mean I know I can find the exact same information at espn.com, msn.foxsports.com, cbssports.com, etc. They all have precisely the same stories. It strange that am able to avoid all the "redundant" websites and just pick my favorite. I must have some sort of special power...
Agreed. My thoughts exactly. I like Jones but to commit a long term deal & a lot of $ would be foolhearted at this point. Build a good offensive line, which we have, and most RB's would be successful.
It's contributing to the absolute shit that makes up the main page over the last few months. Pretty obvious that you don't see that. You can't get to the bottom of the page without having 10 Cutler, 3 TJ etc etc threads staring you in the face. Who are you anyway?
So you are comparing redundant threads to multiple websites. Do they have the same story listed three or four times on the page?
You've now clicked on and bothered with this "absolute shit" thread twice. Why not go for the trifecta? and talk about contributing nothing?!?
I was hoping to drive home a point, which clearly is beyond your level of comprehension. Maybe next time I'll use smaller words like "a" or "the." Carry on...
I mostly lurk but I'm tired of the thread Nazis too. It's much easier to skip over a thread you don't want to read than it is to scroll thru all the wipes comaining about why a thread was created, and the ensuing chiming in off the monkey see posters.
Draft a RB in top 2 rounds of the draft and pickup one of the below (in order or preference). Dominic Rhodes DeShaun Foster Deuce McAllister Rudi Johnson Warrick Dunn
I think some people click on a thread, thinking it will be something different. Besides, you are chiming in, and off topic as well, appeaser.....:rofl:
if the Jets look to draft a RB I would go Beanie Wells without a doubt...that dude can ball man...hes got size and speed...I would take him anyway to be our guy of the future along with Leon...
There are two types of posters on here. The first come here to discuss the Jets and the second come here to shred everyone.
No, actually I have seen the 10 Cutler, 3 TJ threads and if I didn't want to read one, I ignored it. If you're comeback is to "puff up your chest" and pull the "senority" card, I clearly brought up points you have no good rebuttal for. My name is Joe btw, its nice to meet you
IMO (and I'm not just referring to you), cluttering up these threads with complaints just makes you part of the problem.
And those that point out the people pointing people out! Oh dear, what have we started? Bottom line that I think we both agree on: If you don't like a thread title, DON'T READ IT
