If the Jets trade for Bush it will be a big mistake...

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by klecko73, Apr 28, 2006.

  1. klecko73

    klecko73 Guest

    You heard it hear first.
    The Jets have too many needs for this one player to fix.
    He is going to cost too much to trade up and get.
    IF we trade our 2 #1s plus a 2nd or 3rd, you are basically trading our #4, John Abraham and a 2/3 for Bush.
    He simply isn't worth it.

    He is a guy that only touches the ball 15+ times a game.
    That includes runs, passes, kicks and punts.
    You certainly aren't going to risk him returning kicks and punts, so where are you going to get the touches?

    You can't run him inside...that is what Lendale White did at USC.
    If he was such a great inside runner, where was he on the field for 4 & 1 against Texas???

    You can run him to the outside, but his speed advanatage won't be as great at the pro level. Plus he won't have the advantage of running behind the great USC o-line.

    Catches??? Great, but you can't protect your QB anyway, so what good is that?

    IF the Jets pick Bush it is a luxary pick they can neither afford (in draft picks) nor use given their current state. The Jets need alot of bodies and one player simply isn't worth the cost. History shows that 1st rd RB very rarely live upto their draft status. They career expectancy is only about 5 years. You don't trade up for a guy and give that much up for that much risk. IF the Jets FO does, they are no different than Boobway and Herm. Hopefully the Parcells and Belichicken parts of TANGINI will kick in and they will do the right thing and either draft Ferguson or trade down.
     
  2. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    15 times a game? try 25- 30...and if you are going with the touches argument then a QB should be the choice. Bush would probably be our best wideout too. I agree they shouldn't give up too much but for the right price it would be a great move.
     
  3. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,973
    Likes Received:
    4,951
    You make excellent points,but a talent like this cannot be passed up. With Martin well on the downside,we need a future RB,and we haven't seen this kinda talent in years. BTW,LMAO at your sig:rofl: Thats great
     
  4. rickjet

    rickjet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    309
    I agree, this would be a foolish move by Tangini, if they do this!!!!!!
     
  5. NYJets38

    NYJets38 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    0
    15 touches a game?

    I wouldn't want him to carry 30+ all the time, but he can carry the load imo. 20+ carries a game. Might not return kicks but is a threat out of the backfield receiving and can line up at receiver and catch passes.

    USC had the luxury of having 2 of the best backs in the country on their team.
     
  6. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    452
    Oh get the heck outta here. That's a problem with the Jets. Alot of their fans don't know what they are talking about and love mediocre quantity over star quality. This is the biggest no brainer ever for them.
     
  7. klecko73

    klecko73 Guest

    This coming from a guy with Mike Nugent as his avatar...
     
  8. rickjet

    rickjet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    309
    you win with a the big uglies, who is going to block for our QB and new RB????
     
  9. jetman8094

    jetman8094 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    0
    I want to put my name down now as against Reggie Bush at less they can steal the pick from the Saint. That means not give up both your number ones.
     
  10. luvdemjets1998

    luvdemjets1998 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't get me wrong. I totally agree with your point. Giving up that many picks is just insane.

    However, you're off on the 15 touches a game example. The main reason he only got that many touches is b/c USC always blew out their opponents. Believe me, Reggie's endurance is not a problem. He did get 20+ carries in all the close games (i.e. Notre Dame). Plus don't forget they had set plays for him and Lendale White. Just b/c u see him going to the sideline doesn't mean he was tired. The particular play was just designed for Lendale.
     
  11. buddapaw

    buddapaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,590
    Likes Received:
    218
    We should stay at four because we are pretty much guarenteed a decent player now, WE CAN'T LOSE!!!!
     
  12. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,040
    Likes Received:
    25,149
    Bush scares the hell out of me because I know that he can bust just as easily as he can come as advertised, probably much easier.

    We aren't in the position to be spending half of our rebuilding draft picks on a single superstar player. We just gutted our starting roster. We badly need depth in a few different key squads.

    We're not going to do all of that with low draft picks and some FAs. That would be the beginning of a failed rebuilding process, IMO.
     
  13. Warrior

    Warrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    3
    I agree wholeheartedly. My only hope is that the Jets have planned and thought about this scenario and are approaching it without the hysteria seen on this board. It would be great having him, but not if it destroys the foundation of your draft - OJ Simpson was one of the greatest backs that won diddly. As you have pointed out - the Jets have too many needs that cannot be invested in one player who could be a bust or disappear with an injury.
     
  14. luvdemjets1998

    luvdemjets1998 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    My feelings exactly. I know it's tempting, but we have to play this smart.
     
  15. N.Y. Johnny

    N.Y. Johnny Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think I'd chance it for the 2 number 1's and THE 3...NOT the 2.
    I don't like the idea of giving up 2 number 1's AND the 2 for Bush, I know I maybe in the minority, but with the talent in THIS draft I think i'd sit at 4 and take the next best player available there. Possibly too conservative a move to just sit there, but its just a gut feeling.
     
  16. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    you're either retarded or insane or five years old

    check that, you're either retarded or insane
     
  17. klecko73

    klecko73 Guest

    I know what you are saying about the touches issue. But wouldn't you want your best player, Heisman tropy winning running back with the ball for the most critical play of the entire year?

    That being said, its not that I don't like Reggie Bush. I just don't think the Jets should give up that much to move up 2 spots for a RB. RBs can be found throughout any draft in any round. If the Jets were just a RB away...heck go for it. But we have way to many holes to throwing away draft picks on a luxary we can't even block for.

    Additionally, 2 #1s and #3 is too much to move up that far. The Saints will need to send back another pick or picks if this deal is to happen. If you go by the standard chart that everyone knocks but uses in their mocks...

    #2 overall = 2600 pts

    #4, # 29 and #71 = 1800 + 640 + 235 = 2675 pts

    Figure that the Saints will send a 4th rd pick or lower combos to make it happen. I am assuming they will not want to go lower than a top 5-7 pick. The Jets are basically the only team with enough firepower to make that happen unless the 49ers get involved.
     
    #17 klecko73, Apr 28, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 28, 2006
  18. jetsaholic1094

    jetsaholic1094 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Messages:
    6,551
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is by far the best Reggie Bush thread yet.

    I'm not saying he'll end up as Blair Thomas, but people need to remember there's never a sure thing in the draft. I can't say that I'd be pissed if the Jets traded up, but I just hope they don't end up giving away practically all our day 1 picks.
     
  19. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,459
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    I agree with both of you--I would NOT package draft picks for Bush. I WOULD trade the #4 AND some players that don't fit our system (Robertson, Blaylock, etc) for Bush, but then there are cap issues. But I would not make a DIMWIT DUMBWAY trade like Terry did for Robertson and trade 2 number 1s and a number 4 for anybody--no wonder we were in the basement last year.
     
  20. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    First off we won't have to give up that much if the Saints want D'Brick, secondly he can run the ball 20-25 times a game, and will get 5 passes a game, if he is only getting 15 touches a game, Tangini would fail with any player we get whether we do trade up or not, and with a weapon like that it helps the QB out by giving him something to aim for and it will allow him to get the ball out sooner, and with all the attention that could go to Bush, it will only help our receivers
     

Share This Page