Revised Role Has Lowery on a Fast Track

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by 624, Jun 21, 2010.

  1. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Lowery is very underrated on this board, and would it be ridiculous to say that if Cromartie plays to his potential we could have the best #1,2,3, and 4 corners in the NFL?
     
  2. JfaulkNYJ

    JfaulkNYJ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm a big time Lowery fan, but the kid shows up for one game...then is gone for the next 4.

    I dunno about us having the best 1,2,3,4. I know though we have the best 1,2 combo.

    edit: btw it seems like Wilson is talking as the 3year player haha.
     
    #2 JfaulkNYJ, Jun 21, 2010
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2010
  3. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393
    Never happen. Lowery sucks.

    Ask 80 pct of these guys.
     
  4. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    I never understood all the hate for Lowery. Yeah, he was forced into the starters role and didn't do great, but he didn't do nearly as bad as many people make it out to be. Since he was drafted (in the 4th round) he has been known as a ballhawk, but with suspect cover skills. He has shown a knack for getting to the QB and getting his hands on the ball, he should have a great year playing inside
     
  5. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    I'm a big fan of Lowery... as long as you make him play the way he's supposed to. The guy can be a really good nickle or dime CB and he can get physical by blitzing and bringing pressure.

    This will be asked of him this year and I think he'll contribute greatly.

    Last year when he was used in a more conventional role on the outside he got beat because he just doesn't have the physical ability to play there... but as a CB playing in the inside he'll kick some asses (and hopefully get some INT's in the process).
     
  6. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Most of the arguments on the board about Lowery have been whether he can be a #2 or if he's a nickel corner. I believe he is a nickel at best, he just doesn't have the speed to be a starting CB. If the CS believed he could start they wouldn't have acquired Cromartie and Wilson.
     
  7. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't agree with that last part, there's nothing wrong with upgrading a solid starter.
     
  8. jtrain

    jtrain Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    54
    dude give it up. It was a position that needed to be upgraded. And it was a major upgrade at that. Lowery, Coleman these guys are liabilities. Although I believe Coleman is the much bigger liability of the two. CS will get the most out of Lowery by utilizing his strengths in packages.

    Why do people feel Lowery will make a better safety than CB?
     
  9. Rockefella

    Rockefella Trolls

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like Lowery as a nickel CB or in a limited safety role.
     
  10. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    What are you talking about? Why are you telling me to "give it up"

    I'm not even arguing, and I agree with the moves I'm just saying that Lowery is a little underrated

    You need to work on your reading comprehension
     
  11. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is very well known that Lowery plays much better when the play develops in front of him instead of when he's busy trying to play man coverage. He's decent in man, but was a beast in zone where he was able to read the QB as the play developed.

    I still think Lowery would have made and still could be a very good safety.
     
  12. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    The Indy game proved we needed to upgrade at the #2 and #3 CB spots if we ever plan to win the Lombardi. Lowery can't play man to man on the outside, we needed to make a move.
     
  13. sec314

    sec314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    4,641
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Sounds like the dime corner on the inside fits him well. As long as he's not on the outside by himself. He sucks in single coverage, sucks!!!!
     
  14. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    He's obviously well above average for a dime back. That's the role I like him in.

    I never cared for him as the #2, but he can be a decent nickel and a very good dime back IMO. That's a solid secondary if he's our dime.
     
  15. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    Because he doesn't quite have the speed to play CB on the outside. That and his ballhawking abilities make him a good fit for safety; quite simple actually.
     
  16. dthomas53

    dthomas53 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lowery can play no. 2 for a lot of teams in this league. I think people tend to focus solely on his bad plays, without looking around the league for comparison's sake. He's better than handful of starting DBs, that's for sure. I'm not saying that makes him a solid no. 2, but definitely a solid no. 3, IMO.

    If he winds up playing dime this season, I think that says a LOT about our secondary, and even more about Wilson, being able to supplant him as a rookie. Regardless, I expect Rexy to move him around, like he does with everyone, throughout the season.
     
  17. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    he is right where he belongs as the #4. he can make plays and his screw ups won't have much of an impact when covering the 4th option.
     
  18. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    He's shown he can make plays when he hits people, causing fumbles. If he can disguise what he does well enough, he'll have 4 sacks this year, which is a lot for a dime CB. This is perfect role for him, because he's has better skills than any opposing #4 WR.

    The Jets secondary is pretty nasty this year.
     
  19. jtrain

    jtrain Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    54
    I did not finish my statement. The CS do not believe he could start. This is the reason we upgraded to Cro and Wilson. I don't understand why you do not see this. Lowery as a starter at the CB position is not underrated at all. He isn't good at all. How do you not see this! He is limited which is why he has to now be put in to certain packages to maximize his effectiveness on the team. Hop off his dick.
     
  20. jtrain

    jtrain Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    54
    Be careful, teams like saints and colts 4th WRs are good against opposing teams 4th cbs.


    I will consider Clark a 4th Wr

    Wayne
    Garcon
    Collie
    Clark

    Would you trust Lowery guarding Clark?
     

Share This Page