Revis should be on Welker

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by StreetFighterJet, Sep 14, 2010.

  1. facch

    facch Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    2
    The opposite is true. Leonhard is one of my favorite Jets, but he's not a great cover guy. Smith is worse. They both excel in the box and tackling when plays are in front of them. The blitzing schemes balance this out as the quarterback is supposed to have less time to allow plays develop down field.
     
  2. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Toward our endzone in 50+ yard chuncks?
     
  3. GoPats

    GoPats Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    47
    Thinking like a boxer...

    Welker is the jab. You can take a bunch of them, but eventually they hurt you.

    Moss is the KO, the right cross...

    If I was coaching the Jets, I'd put Revis on Moss, effectively making it 10 guys on 10 guys.
     
  4. facch

    facch Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    2
    And Billy B's got coins hidden in his boxing gloves.
     
  5. StreetFighterJet

    StreetFighterJet New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well that jab burned us for almost 200 yards the last time we played them.

    I just like the idea of double teaming Moss vs double teaming Welker.
     
  6. Jet Setters

    Jet Setters New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Welker is the Ali Jab mixed with the moves of Sweat Pea.........
     
  7. GoPats

    GoPats Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    47
    True, but think back to the KOs of 2007. I don't think the Jets offense is built to come back from a 10-point deficit.

    They're anvils, actually. :up:
     
  8. Vorrecht

    Vorrecht Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    6,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's funny is that the Ravens completely ignored Revis. So, the whole thing before the game about going after him because of the holdout was a complete non-factor.
     
  9. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    Well here is what I see, Moss would beat Cro like a punching bag and even with help just due to sheer size difference he would catch it over the safety. Moss is much more of a physical threat than Boldin and we saw how Boldin did.

    At least with Welker if we are physical with him since Cro and Wilson dominates him physically we'd have a better chance than last year with an improvement over Lito Sheppard and Lowery. And even if Welker gets open the worst he can hit us with is a 10-15 yard completion. With Moss it would be a 50 yard TD pass

    You are underestimating Moss since you are so spoiled with how Revis has done against him.
     
  10. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    Him not sticking with Boldin the entire game is probably a big part of that.
     
  11. CBG

    CBG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,122
    Likes Received:
    4,971
    IF Cromartie played bump and run the way I know he can I would leave him man to man with safety help at time on MOSS. TROUBLE IS HE DID NOT PLAY VERY GOOD BUMP AND RUN last nite he was not bumping the WR at the line he was grabbing Bolden and company after they were already past him,,,,most times. I like Revis on Welker AND will take my chances with Cro on Moss as I said with help at times------------Wilson on Edelman or tate could pose BIG issues--we will see Soon enough
    WE NEED THIS WIN!
     
  12. sbx213

    sbx213 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Revis on Moss like he always had. 30+ yard catches over and over is a loss.
     
  13. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I'd like to see Revis on Moss 1st and 2nd downs. On 3rd and longs I'd roll with Revis on Welker, roll coverage to Moss and take my chances with Wilson/Lowery on the other pricks.
     
  14. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    Hmm bump and run the 6'4" 210 lb WR or the 5'9" 185 lb WR
    We got abused with Boldin why do we want to tempt fate with Moss?
     
  15. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    Did you watch Cromartie attempt to play Bump and Run... that requires that you actually BUMP, or attempt to Bump the receiver at the LOS... he did NOT do that, and it wasn't corrected in the game, I don't think it will be corrected during the week either... JMO
     
  16. SuppaMan

    SuppaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Revis would be less successful covering Welker anyways. He could physically handle him easier but it's a tougher matchup to be covering in the slot and a lot of Welker's plays are quick hitch, slant, curl, or out patterns for just a few yards. Those aren't the easiest to defend if the ball is thrown well.

    It's why he's had such success. Welker runs good routes, has (or had) great agility, has above average acceleration, and has great hands. Possessing those qualities while having good throws being made in your direction is why he and the Pats have been so successful together. His agility and quickness (along with his sure hands) are what allows him to pick up yards after the catch.

    Even if he's covered well, the old Welker (still debatable how close to his old self he is) would still rack up quite a few catches, he just probably wouldn't gain much if anything after the catch. You would still probably see 5-10 catches for 40-60 yards at worst unless the QB made poor throws or was under intense pressure most of the time.
     
  17. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    I agree completely with this post. Cro has the size and athleticism to match up well with Moss. I think Revis would be better suited on shutting down Welker and giving that game plan a shot. If it fails, maybe Rex can make in-game adjustments this time unlike the Ravens game where the DBs got torched by Boldin.
     
  18. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    Because Moss plays softer than Boldin does. If Moss has 7" and only 25 lbs on Boldin, I'd say Boldin's a little tougher to play bump and run with.
     
  19. JfaulkNYJ

    JfaulkNYJ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    0
    How about we don't blitz as much and fucking get dbacks all over everybody on 3rd down situations?
    But for real Revis/Moss
    Alternate Cromartie, and Wilson on Welker, and see if we have early success... if not Brodney Pool, and Wilson should be able to handle Welker.
     
  20. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    Moss >> Welker

    And as for Moss vs Boldin, Boldin isn't nearly as bad of a deep threat as Moss is and unlike Flacco, Brady would make us pay for that matchup
     

Share This Page