01/12/2007 12:59 PM ET Looking into the Jets' crystal ball Where did the team go wrong, and how can they improve By Michael Salfino / SNY.tv D'Brickashaw Ferguson has not yet lived up to the hype, but still has time to show he's a star next season. (AP) The Jets' pleasantly surprising season looked like it had wings Sunday in New England, but they lost lift with a very stupid, all-risk, no-reward lateral screen that handed the dagger to the playoff assassin that is Tom Brady. The rapid descent into postseason oblivion was punctuated by another rainbow throw from Chad Pennington that the Pats turned into a Pick 6. So now it's time to look ahead by first looking back coldly and objectively at what transpired, assessing strengths and weaknesses and recommending a course of action for 2007 and beyond. How good was this team? The question seems trite but it's essential that we answer it if we're to get a real sense of how much work needs to be done, personnel wise, heading into the summer. So, let's compare it first to the last Jets playoff team, the 2004 squad helmed by Herm Edwards. Eric Mangini's bunch suffers by the comparison. In the 14 meaningful statistical categories that the NFL tracks, the 2006 Jets ranked higher than the 2004 Jets in only one offensive and one defensive category. These categories are extremely important, third-down efficiency and yards allowed per pass attempt, but so are many of the others where the 2006 Jets fell far short. The 2004 Jets also were much better in most of the key stats that I track, the exceptions being net yards per pass attempt (2006 Jets 12th, 2004 Jets 13th) and net third-down efficiency (2006 Jets 4th, 2004 Jets 9th). What's alarming about this is how the 2004 Jets crashed in 2005. Injuries were a huge factor here. But are the 2006 Jets, the healthiest team in the NFL, due for some bad luck in that area next year? Coaches and general managers are funny in how they attribute a rash of injuries to bad luck and the absence of them to training or other factors in their control. That's human nature. We take credit for good fortune and curse fate when things go sour. Expect the Jets to have to overcome some significant injuries in 2007. The player Most Likely to Get Hurt this year, Chad Pennington, sailed through the season unscathed. And he's the key to assessing the 2007 team. Is Pennington capable of being a championship QB off the two major shoulder surgeries? He says he's all the way back. But the stats say otherwise. His arm appeared to tire as the season progressed. His ability to throw intermediate passes disintegrated, going from above average the first third to average the second third to awful down the stretch. In 2002, the last time he was otherwise healthy and not dealing with shoulder problems or recovery, he was 61 of 96 on 11-to-20 yard passes for 1066 yards with five TDs and two picks. That's a sparkling 110 QB rating. And those intermediate throws represent 24 percent of total attempts (NFL average is about 20). This year, however, Pennington was 52 of 99 on intermediate throws for 931 yards with four TDs and six picks (a 73 QB rating and just 20 percent of total attempts). The receivers this year were as good as those in 2002. Coles is still Coles. Cotchery/McCareins performed about as well as Chrebet/Moss did in '02. Perhaps the offense wasn't as well designed as in 2002, but that seems unlikely given the regard people have for young offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer. So we must conclude that, barring continued shoulder improvements nearly two years after the last surgery, Pennington's lack of arm strength is a major obstacle to any serious playoff/championship aspirations. I sense that Mangini and the rest of his staff knows this and that's the reason why he insists the QB job will be an open competition in 2007. I would be surprised but not shocked if second-year man Kellen Clemens, extremely well regarded coming out of the 2006 draft, emerged as a surprise starter next September. The Jets can certainly afford to keep Pennington around even if they're flirting with Clemens as the starter. They have only one significant player, journeyman starting right tackle Anthony Clement, eligible for free agency. With Curtis Martin finally off the books, they have $28 million in salary cap room. So they can be major players in free agency. But singing big-name guys and wining and dining players was frowned upon at Belichick University. Don't expect the Jets to make a major splash in free agency, focusing instead on signing lesser-known, versatile, team-oriented players that have football smarts and fit their system. The Jets also shrewdly acquired the 37th pick in the upcoming draft via trade with the Redskins last April. They retain their first-round pick, 25th overall. These are very valuable because they come in at a relatively low cost and are generally easy to sign. With high first-round draft picks, you get all the risk involved with projecting college prospects, but pay to sign these players as if the risk did not exist. Economists Cade Massey and Richard Thaler studied the draft a couple of years ago and determined that picks increase in value relative to signing cost as you go down the first and into the second round. So that 37th overall pick is NFL gold. Did the Jets get their money's worth this year out of D'Brickashaw Ferguson, who was competent but far from dominant as a rookie? Likely not, and they paid dearly for him. He must improve in all facets if he's going to become anything close to the player that NFL scouts and the Jets envisioned last April. Remember, however, that, as Massey and Thaler conclusively proved, NFL scouts and general managers are mostly very wrong when it comes to projecting college prospects. Now, what should the priorities be in personnel? The conventional wisdom is that the Jets must acquire a workhorse running back, enabling them to slide Leon Washington back into a situational role. But this ignores the possibility, albeit a small one, that Washington could become a Brian Westbrook-type of player in a more expanded role. More importantly, however, it ignores the incontrovertible fact that running backs are the most overpaid players in the NFL. I examined nearly 40 statistical categories between 2004 and 2006 to determine how they correlated to winning. Yards gained per rushing attempt finished 30th on my list and even overall rushing yards in 2006 was last, with the top 10 teams in the category winning, on average, just under 52 percent of their games. You need to throw to win in the NFL. And it's an offensive, not a defensive game. If you finish top 10 in TD pass percentage the last three years, you can expect to win 67 percent of your games. The top 10 in offensive yards per attempt clock in at 65 percent wins during this most recent, three-year stretch. So, the Jets must improve in these key stat categories either by hoping that Pennington improves on the tougher, money NFL throws, replacing him with Clemens or improving an already solid wide receiving corps. Defensively, the Jets did quite well in the preventing touchdown passes, the most important defensive stat by far the last three years. The cornerbacks are held in low regard by most observers. So, you can argue they're underrated, credit the coaching or attribute the solid stats to a schedule littered sub-par passing opponents, especially in the second half of the season. To be safe, assume the latter played a major role and hope the Jets make major upgrades in the defensive backfield. The defensive line is another area that needs to be addressed. Shaun Ellis was okay in 2006, but made few impact plays. The Jets got next to nothing out of the other defensive end spot. Expect that to be an off-season priority, as the team badly needs a lineman who can generate consistent pressure on the opposing passer. So, it's a lot to do and indicative of a team that's very far away from a finished product. The Jets will battle expectations next year. The deck is stacked against them improving, given the likelihood of a tougher schedule and injuries to overcome (where none existed this year except for Curtis Martin, who no one ever expected to play). But the Jets are helmed by young, aggressive and smart people who've learned from the brightest minds in the game and who are not afraid to think outside the box, so crucial to success in what's become a cookie-cutter league. They also have the benefit of a very friendly cap situation and the success enjoyed in their first year, which should make them a more attractive destination for any players they seek.
Terrible article. Salfino just throws out random statistics that really shouldn't be in the article. I think this is the first postseason article ive read that portrays the 2006 NYJ negatively.
Well if this reporter analysis is correct then it seems most of our players are margianal & have to be upgraded which BTW I fully agree with. Thanks for bringing it our attention
This guy hits all the major nails on the head. He really seems to know what he is talking about and one thing that i've been afraid of all year... Sentiment can only go so far, this is the NFL!
I really enjoyed this article. I think it was a vry well written piece. Also a piece that you never see in the news. Kudos to the writer
d brick didnt live up to the hype? what hype? he did fine. this years o-line was much better than last years. Are we ever gonna stop hearing about chads shoulder? Its an offensive not a defensive game? ok 2000 ravens all i have to say. this guy is a moron
You are aware hopefully that Brick surrendered 10 sacks & the league hi was 13. Do you consider that fine? How about his opening holes for the RG? Did U see many of those? Do you consider that also fine?
You can download a copy of the Massey/Thaler study here: www.wcfia.harvard.edu/seminars/pegroup/MasseyThaler.pdf
This is just more fuel for all the Penny haters. So dumb.. The statistics are very random in this article, and half of them dont relate to much within this article. I consider that to be exceptable with all things considered. He is a rookie, and had a tough task. He was taking on some of the best ends in the league each and every Sunday. It happens.. He still showed promise, and he obviously just needs some time to pick up his role on this line. I have no doubts at all, and think he will be amazing next season. Now if he has another year like this one next season, or worse.... Then I might be a little worried. :/
Well that is fine but he has loooooooooooooooooooooong way to go to live up to his #4 draft spot. U R aware SD picked a guy in either the 2nd or 3rd round (not sure) who totally outperformed Brick are U not?
His critisism of Ferguson reaks of an ignorant fan that thinks he should have been a pro bowler in his rookie year. Ferguson did what any educated football fan expected. He's great against the speed rush, can be bull rushed and needs to improve on his run blocking. None of that was a surprise at all. Anyone who followed the draft knew all of that coming into the season, and to say they overpaid based on his rookie year is downright STOOOOOOOOOOOOPID. He sounds more like some clueless Dolphins fan trolling at GG. What WAS a surprise was how well Mangold made the adjustment to the pros. Did this asswipe mention Mangold at all? I'm no blind homer.... we still have holes, and next year's schedule looks brutal. Pennington's arm faded? The TD pass to Cotch looked pretty crisp to me. Geeze, everyone knows Chad doesn't have a storng arm. This is insightful? He makes it sound like Pennington had no right to start all 16 games. He should have been injured. Talk about negative spin. Where this guy proves he's a complete idiot is when he says the NFL is an offensively dominated game. Where has that gotten the Colts? Or the Chiefs? it STARTS with the defense, it ENDS with the offense. Pittsburgh won with defense, not offense last year. The Bears may well do the same thing this year. guy is an asswipe.
Not too mention that the 10 sacks is misleading. He tired at the end of the season. Noone can dispute that fact. The one Buffalo game he let up 3. Up to the buffalo game he was excellent. He gave up 1--2 the next 3 games. It is not unusual for rookies to hit a wall at that point of the season. So in 25% of the season he gave up 60-70% of his sacks. Lets see how well he does after an offseason to bulk up. Remember all the haters with the exception of a few were no where to be found the first 3/4 of the season. My suspicion is that he will be marketably improved next year with the extra bulk and another year under his belt.
I thought Ferguson did a great job protecting the quaterback unlike last year when two BQs went down fast and the third one survived only because he was very mobile and still got tattoed left and right. We did have some injuries. We will never know how much better the D line would have been with Pouha at NT and Robertson at DE. I believe Kendall was injured in the beginning when we had no running game at all which improved when he came back. Houston was hurt too. So was Dyson.
The problem with using statistics to analyse anything is that there are lies, damned lies, then statistics. Having used statistics professionally, they are certainly useful, but they don't give you the whole picture. They certainly don't give you the whole picture of D'Brick's very good first year as an NFL LT.
Face it, the article was right on. I like what he said about the possibility of Washington becomming a Westbrook type, and this possibility should not be overlooked. His one run against the Fish late in the game says it all. That was sick.
THUNDERBIRD: Pennington's arm faded? The TD pass to Cotch looked pretty crisp to me. Geeze, everyone knows Chad doesn't have a storng arm. This is insightful? He makes it sound like Pennington had no right to start all 16 games. He should have been injured. Talk about negative spin. The pass traveled about 6 yards and COTCHERY did the rest. Lets be fair and objective. We call the writer names but then unfairly state misinformation.
" ARE YOU AWARE" HE'S A ROOKIE....... I didnt see many penalties on him in my opionion he was fine. better rushing game and protection then last year by the whole o-line.
Marcus McNeil was taken in the 2nd round by the Chargers. He was the AFC offensive Rookie of the month in September and finished 3rd in the AFC offensive Rookie of the Year. Last year threads about the OT's I had him rated as a far better prospect then D'Brickasha Ferguson... go back and read the threads. At Auburn, he was a roadgrading run blocker for Cadillac Williams and Ronnie Brown and in his three seasons as a starter at Auburn he surrendered ZERO sacks. Ferguson was one of those highly prized 'athletes' who projected to be a better NFL player than a college player with unlimited potential because of his triangle numbers, 'feet like a ballerina' and athleticism... Same resume as DeWayne Robertson. In the NFL, no rookie wall excuse for MCNeil who gave up two sacks all season to Ferguson's 11 sacks given up. McNeil is, like in college, a far superior run blocker.
Think it is a fantastic spot on article about the Jets. Many fans refuse to acknowledge some of the key points he made in this article that are definitely true: 1. Penngington's arm tired as the year went on 2. Pennington is most successfull in the mid-range passing game and he was poor in that this year 3. Leon Washington can be a Barber/Westrbrook type and should not be given up on yet as a feature back, which so many want to do here 4. Our biggest need is DE on defense, not NT 5. Brick needs to improve a lot (He DID tire, and he did play poorly the last quarter of the season, but I think he will get there He should have mentioned Mangold, but I think he really sums up our teams needs well.