How many years before Herbert, Daniel's were the guy? You can turn it around in a year, it's not just the QB you need to hit on though, it's just as important to get the coach. We don't have that guy, ours wants slow drip coffee and big ships that have a hard time turning around...
You can't count on anomalies.... not to mention there isn't a prospect on those guys level in this upcoming draft
Stroud, RG3, Russell Wilson, Prescott, Dart anomaly yes but there are quite a few and those are off the top of my head. Did any of those guys look like top prospects? Maybe Daniel's/Stroud but that's it really.
Had to vote C to C-. To be first to vote that way and lodge my protest. Jets are 1 -7. I surmise FO decided the season was shot so just blow it up, gather a bunch of high picks, and hope for productive draft picks. My protest is not about losing Sauce and Q. It's about fucking the fan base for another 2 to 3 years during the rebuild.
Like another poster said, if the coaching works out, there's no such thing as a long term rebuild anymore in the modern NFL. One season is all you need.
The trades themselves were great. I just wish there were more of them; anyone on their last year should have been traded for peanuts.
This 100% and I hope I am wrong about Glenn, I really really do but I am 99.999% sure if he remains the coach we are staring down the barrel of a old school 3 year failed rebuild. We should have been a lot more competitive this season, we are worse than last year under brick. 1st year in any age NFL (modern NFL is expedited, nobody sells 3 year rebuilds anymore) should have shown some competency and fight followed by a year we are competing for a wild card, do you think we are a wild card team next year? 2027?
The timing on their price hike wasn't well thought out was it... Price hikes during a complete rebuild isn't the best way to generate good will with a very pissed off Fan base.
I guess it depends on the scale you're grading on. I dont really do letter grades. Sauce for two firsts is a great deal in terms of value. Indy is good, but they're putting a lot of faith in Daniel Jones. Whose to say they dont come back to earth a bit and give the Jets a nice middle of the round pick. I dont know enough about Mitchell, so I'm just pretending he wasn't apart of the trade. Quinnen for a 2026 second and a 2027 first is also a pretty good deal in terms of value. If its true he requested to be traded three times, that makes the return even more impressive. They managed to keep it in-house and didnt effect the return. And once again, the Packers and Cowboys are not world beaters. The better of those two picks could easily be in the top 15 of the draft. I dont know anything about the DT they got, so I'm pretending he wasn't a part of the trade. Having said that, Sauce is a very good to potentially excellent player who seemingly wanted to be here. If your mindset on grading the trade was that we shouldn't be trading players of his caliber, I think its totally fair to give it a low grade.
A+ Everyone is so focused on the draft picks, which are nice. Look at all the money that just came off the books? Free Agency is now a viable option for significant gains.
RG3, Herbert (for a few years), Daniels and Stroud definitely.... Hard to bank on 4th rd picks like Dak and R. Wilson having that sort of success. Jury's still out on Dart (but I'll admit he looks alot better than I expected so far)
I'm hoping they don't dive deep into the FA $ pool until 2027 (granted I don't know who will be available).... start building a young foundation, carry over some '26 cap space, and hopefully get some comp picks for once.
Do you think 3 additional first round picks, a 2nd round pick, and a young WR might help our chances of acquiring and supporting a QB?
I may be cynical here, but don't the Jets sell out every game? In addition, many of the "fans" are from out of town and are routing for the visiting team. The Jets are a very profitable franchise and I don't think they care.
I’ll bring it up again though. So we should not try to gain draft assets because previous regimes have been bad at drafting? How do you ever build something if the answer to everything is we sucked at it in the past?
Sorry…this is the exact kind of thinking that justifies moves like this in trading away great players Ooohhh…wow….you know, these guys are going to want big money? Oh no! Let’s trade them now!! No shit … great players will want big money…they always do…because they’ve EARNED it! That’s the name of the game. I hate this thinking…it’s just as bad as the “well we weren’t winning WITH them, we can lose without them” Both of those go hand in hand…the calling card of a dysfunctional inept team Why? Because well run teams actually figure out WHO to pay and HOW to pay them…something we haven’t been able to figure out
It's a loser mentality, that's what this team has and what Glenn is perpetrating with his decision making. You could go back to 2000 on this board and see people saying the same exact thing when we traded away players and sold the rebuild, it's part of the toxic culture this team created. Good teams don't do that, not rocket science that all the well run teams traded FOR players at the deadline.
