Go get johnson, please......

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by jilozzo, Mar 5, 2007.

  1. jilozzo

    jilozzo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    2,668
    OK folks i am going on record to personally rubber stamp whatever method the jets must do to get CJ.....

    now those of you who actually read my sporadic posts know that i rarely approve drafting certain players at such a high spot. the golden rule is to NEVER draft a WR, RB, CB, or OL with a top 5 pick......

    However, there comes a time to break your mold and this may just be the time.

    hey we do NOT know what has or will go down. The Lions may play hard ball, the jets may play low ball, etc etc. Regardless of what happens the possibility NEEDS to be explored and the jets should be very serious about giving up picks and players to move up the necessary 20+ spots.

    We know they inquired about bush, leinart and vernon davis last year so we know they will at leats inquire about johnson right?

    The impact of this guy would be huge IF he lives up to the hype which appears to be almost a given. i am NOT thrilled about having pennington throw this guy the ball but even this guy could make CP a better downfield passer. (ok - a little bit better). but it only starts there. He would give the jets that guy the defenses HAVE TO attend to....

    i do not have the value chart in front of me but i believe the #2 spot is 25-2600pts or so....

    this years 1st, this years 2nd (the jets 2nd, not the one from wash) and next years first.......

    ok rant over, comments always respected,

    jil
     
  2. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    Don't get Johnson, please! Stay where you are and keep your picks, more top 100 players for less money is better than 1 completely unproven entity for a ton of money. We go through this nonsense ever year. Don't panic, we are in good hands. We will get quality and value that will enable us to compete each year on a high level. Rash moves like this are foolish, especially considering where we are in our development cycle.
     
  3. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hell to the no.
     
  4. AlToon4prez

    AlToon4prez Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Im all for a Kellen Clemens to Calvin Johnson connection for the next 10 years
     
    #4 AlToon4prez, Mar 5, 2007
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2007
  5. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    The only thing that would make this even remotely appealing is the prospect of having Kellen Clemens deliver the ball in the near future (in other words, if he's starting within 1-2 years). Otherwise, I consider this a complete and utter waste of resources at this time and, quite frankly and even more serious, possibly squandering our future over one guy.

    I think the move would be considerably short-sighted. I also think he would break the bank in terms of dollars to sign him, further crippling our recovery.

    I just don't think we're the team that can afford to make this move at this particular time. I'd do this thing if things were slightly different, but they're not. Our lines are NOT SB-caliber, nor are some other positions. Call me "too conservative," as I'm sure most of you will.
     
  6. NYJetsMetsCTHuskies

    NYJetsMetsCTHuskies Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be a mistake for the Jets to give so much for the 2nd overall pick. We don't even need a WR, I'm very happy with Coles and Cotchery.

    To move up from 25th to 2nd, we would have to give up a lot. It's not worth it for a WR.

    I never think it is a good idea to move that high unless you are drafting a QB, which we don't need. I wouldn't even give that much for AP.
     
  7. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Calvin Johnson would be amazing, but unless we trade Coles and other picks to move up I dont think we need him.

    If they move up to 2, draft Peterson.
     
  8. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    If we can package Coles with our first and one of our seconds this would be the steal of the draft. It will not happen, the writtings on the wall the Pats are going to trade up and get him.
     
  9. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    what tells you the pats are moving up for Johnson? just because they have 2 first rounders, doesn't mean much they just got welker and are apparently trying to trade for Randy Moss... don't think they would need calvin johnson too....
     
  10. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Great logic. I think it's safe to assume at this point that any player that might be a good fit on the Jets will wind up on the Pats if the Jets don't get him.
     
  11. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have to say that I love CJ as a prospect and salivate at the thought of him playing with us. However, I will say that I'm completely undecided about the prospect of trading Vilma for him and leaning towards not doing it. I'm sick of people saying that Johnson wouldn't fit in, however. I posted this in the other thread:

    He'd definitely improve our offense, even if we did give up Coles in the process. However, is it worth the possible hit on defense and from losing possibly 2 other prospects?
     
  12. curtisstaysforever28

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    0
    no for CJ, thats all i have to say...just no
     
  13. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    Some might call it pessimism rather than logic. Not me, I'm looking for the Joey Porter annoucement from the Pats any minute now.
     
  14. Going4TheGreen

    Going4TheGreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    26
    The non intelligent argument would be Chad can't even get the ball to that kind of receiver. Randy Moss and Chad Pennington did all kinds of good things together in college. Look it up. Moss is 6'4, weighs 210, is a bad route runner, questionable character. CJ is 6'5, 239, great route runner, equal hands, equal speed, great character. If you throw the ball like a girl, you want a big target to go to, you don't necessarily want a speedy small guy that you have to throw to as soon as he makes the cut, you want someone who can go get the ball, which Johnson clearly can. It's like a TE for a rookie. A rookie QB relies on his TE a lot.

    The right argument is it's probably not a good time to make such a move, but it would be nice to have an impact player for years to come. Unfortunately, I think this move would set us back too far.
     
  15. Going4TheGreen

    Going4TheGreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    26
    I agree with you man. I say that if we send Coles, which would be weird the Lions did because they have Roy Williams and Mike Furrey, then do it. Because Cotch is young and good, and CJ is younger and even better. It depends on how JV will adapt in his 2nd season of the 3-4 to determine whether or not to send him rather than Coles. But if we got CJ then we have trade bait in Coles for another position.
     
  16. red75bronco

    red75bronco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    467
    Other than Jerry Rice, a reciever has never won a superbowl. It did not work for us with Keyshawn or Minnesota with Moss.
     
  17. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    There are an incredible amount of HOF WR who just happend to be on SB teams including the Jets SB team. Warfield, Swan, Stalworth, Irvin to name a few you can throw in with Rice.
     
  18. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    Hell no! Way to expensive to fill a position that is not a need! Coles and Cotch are one of the best WR tandems going right now.
     
  19. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    They are adequate and Coles is likely on the back 9. If we can move Coles right now when he is at he's absolute peak for a real game changing stud it would be so worth while for a team that's clearly a few years away.
     
  20. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    This team is not a few years away. Fill the needs (CB, DT, OG, etc.) and we are set to make a run next yr. 10-6 and a playoff birth this yr was a great first step, next season is the time to make the SB run.
     

Share This Page