Jets still getting screwed by the WESTSIDE STADIUM fiasco!

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Kentucky Jet, Jun 24, 2007.

  1. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Yep sure are 12 seats worth
     
  2. Gator

    Gator Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    9

    So how come you seem happy that this would increase the PSLs?

    This should be a doozy......
     
  3. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    He likes negativity. Plus he's not going to the games from Texas or Miami or wherever. When you see those no-shows at games you just can't figure out it's probably because champ is hoarding 12 tickets from out of state. :grin:
     
  4. Gator

    Gator Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    9


    Uh-uh, bro. He was like....Ha, now the psls will go up. Basically he's saying, Yay, I have to give the Jets 100 grand instead of 60. Seems a little weird. I wanna hear this spin. This may take the miz..the master with a little masse here.
     
  5. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    Maybe he just thrives on Jets fans being unhappy, no matter the reason.
     
  6. Joe Willie White Shoes

    Joe Willie White Shoes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    8,145
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    Well the West Side rail yards and the whole riverfront area are sure being put to good use now, right? I mean the private investment is just pouring in and the construction of affordable housing (or any housing) and the restaurants and the promenade and parks being built there just warms the heart and pocketbook of every New Yorker!!!!

    Nothing will be built on that prime real estate for years and years and all that means is lost revenue for the city.

    Why is it that the city pays $300 million to upgrade the area around the new Yankee Stadium and that is acceptable, but the city was getting "ripped off" by making the same infrastructure investment for the WSS????

    And did that $300 million that the city didn't have to spend go towards hiring more firemen and teachers and improving the schools as we all heard?? That was a lie also.

    And the traffic that the WSS would have caused!!! I'm surprised the city residents don't complain about all that traffic for the theater on Saturday Nights! Why don't we close more Broadway Theaters so we can decrease the traffic on the West Side on Saturday Nights. The whole thing was a political joke and now the joke is on NYC while the Hudson Rail Yards remain a wasteland.
     
    #26 Joe Willie White Shoes, Jun 25, 2007
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2007
  7. Justwinit

    Justwinit Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    74
    Great post. Sheldon f'n Silver is all I think about when I think of the WSS. For the Jets to even go through with the effort and money to finally bring us home was all I could ask for as a long time fan. It still pisses me off that it fell through.
     
  8. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    Compareing a football stadium that has 10 dates and a few other limited uses to a broadway theatre, the size of a movie theatre that seats a few hundred to a couple of thousand people is used 6 days a week 52 weeks a year and draws people from all over the world every day and is currently served by public transportation area hotels and resturants to a limited use stadium that will serve the same 60,000 people 10 dates a year plus a few concerts at the cost of 10's of billions to the City and the State is sheer BS and exactly why this white elephant was stopped.

    It wasn't the traffic that was the problem, it was the rip off of the tax payers that was the problem. Woody cheaped out and was outright ripping off the City and State.
     
    #28 winstonbiggs, Jun 25, 2007
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2007
  9. stinkyB

    stinkyB 2009 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    14,057
    Likes Received:
    12,737

    Do you really think a retractable dome in the city would only be used in that capacity?
     
  10. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think it would have been a white Elephant much like the Dome that was built in Seattle and was ultimately torn down.

    I think there is something inherently wrong when the richest sports league in the richest city in the world has to exploit the general taxpaying public to build stadiums that are designed primarily to serve as a place where corporations can entertain clients. That's exactly what the WSS was designed to do.
     
  11. sec314

    sec314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    4,641
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Great post Joe Willie. I am season tic holder for 27 years. Live in Jersey but went to Shea. I wanted them to got the West Side but I was concerned about tailgating. Bottom line, NY politicians suck. Great, invest in Yanks and Mets when they already exist so there is no additional revenue to be had and bag your only chance of getting the NFL back. We are going to have our own state of the art stadium in Jersey. That's right, on Sunday's when we are home it ours and that's all the matters
     
  12. APK 8

    APK 8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,923
    Likes Received:
    171
    And replaced (with taxpayer money) by not one, but two high dollar facilities. Both are considered premiere stadiums for their sports. I don't hear cries of ripoff coming from the folks in Seattle.

    I also don't see how one can say Woody cheaped out when he was investing $1 billion of his own money. Yes, he like any other developer, was exploiting the taxpayers, but it wasn't exactly like the city was giving away a new stadium to the Jets.
     
  13. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    The folks in Seattle own the stadium and rent it to the Seahawks with an investment lower than what the City of NY and State were going to put up to give the stadium to Woody. By the way Allen spent 1.7 billion lobbying the state and city to build it and threatened to move the team several times. The Seahawks pay rent.

    The Mariners don't own Safeco field either.
     
    #33 winstonbiggs, Jun 26, 2007
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2007
  14. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Why would you think I am happy about the up coming PSLs?
     
  15. asbcheeks

    asbcheeks Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    13
    I believe the term is QFT.
     
  16. Gator

    Gator Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    9
    Because you seemed to be taking glee in it by typing.... Ha this will increase the PSLs. Ha is one half of Ha-Ha.
     
  17. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    "Even an MTA source close to the negotiations couldn't understand why the agency has not released the Jets' letter of credit and continues to press the team on the spill cleanup."

    In my opinion, the bottom line concerning this article is that the MTA is not going to win this battle. Apparently even their own people see this as pointless and senseless also. If they don't release the Jets' letter of credit and do it soon, the Jets will sue them for the release and be successful, IMO. There is no way the Jets should be responsible for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that it was ultimately not their decision that the WSS scenario was rejected and they never contributed to this oil spill in the first place. It'll be sen as an attempt by the MTA to get someone else (the Jets) to clean up their own mess. This won't cost the Jets a dime and this is all much ado about nothing. And it certainly will have nothing to do with PSLs, one way or the other.
     
  18. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Just verbage alerting all season tix that this defense may be added into the PSLs. Again why do you think I would be elated to give the NYJs almost 100Gs or more of my money?
     
  19. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3

    I agree that from the teams' standpoint a shared stadium at the Meadowlands is a good idea. They've both been playing there for decades and the site and sharing the expenses does make perfect sense. More sense financially than both of them building seperate stadiums five miles apart.

    Where I think the WSS would have been great is from the point of view of the city itself--and again I'm a Jersey guy. Aside from having NFL games back in the city 8-10 times a year, you would have also had the Super Bowl (that was a done deal), the Final Four, concerts, all kinds of things to bring people and revenue back into the city. Not to mention improving Javitz as I mentioned. I do shows at Javitz and I know first hand that if there was development in that area, especially the 7 train going there, it would bring a lot more trade show business to the city all year.

    People get so hung up on spending tax dollars that they don't look at the big picture and the revenue a project like the WSS would bring back in. Of course in the short term it sounds better to just put the money up front into cops, teachers, etc, but did that actually even happen? And wouldn't it be better to create a revenue source that could bring money to cops, firemen, etc for years to come? It's just the same short-sighted, self-serving politics that has always crippled NYC from progress. Same reason they didn't get cable TV until the 90s when the rest of the civilized world had it since the 70s.
     
  20. JetFighter

    JetFighter Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    31

    Well said my man. If someone were smart, they'd put some kind of ticker on a big building down town showing how much tax revenue would be lost each day for New York because the WSS was not built. This is short-sighted politics at its worst
     

Share This Page