Jets to make a "Serious" run at Samuel

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by mcmagic, Jan 29, 2008.

  1. mcmagic

    mcmagic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm kind of torn on this. Samuel + Revis is one of the best defensive backfields in the NFL however the Jets have so many more pressing needs that giving a huge contract to a CB might be a misuse of funds...
     
  2. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    The jets want to run a man coverage/blitzing defense. If we are going to do that we need another coner opposite Revis...I am ALL for this guy.
     
  3. allan1

    allan1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,840
    Likes Received:
    13
    indeed it would be a misuse of funds. If this team has any strengths at all, it's the secondary. We can either make a pretty good secondary into a great secondary (all the while weakening a rival) or we can focus on shoring up various other positions with money that would be tied up in one player.
     
  4. The philosophy is likely based solely on stopping the Pats. Lets face it, the only way we're getting to the next level as a franchise is by beating our most immediate competition; The Patriots.

    Their greatest strength is the passing game. Adding a "1B" type CB like Samuel to pair w/ Revis, would give us a secondary capable of matching up w/ anyone.

    Do i like the move? I guess it depends on what else we plan to do in FA. If this is the only move we're gonna make...I hate it. But if we target acouple Young linemen on both sides of the ball...and sign acouple role players...I think signing samuel would be a fantastic move.

    We shall see.
     
  5. TheCoolerGlennFoley

    TheCoolerGlennFoley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    32
    You know what though look at San Diego. They have two excellent ballhawking corners and wound up with 3 picks against Brady. I'd have to see what the numbers are before I commit but I don't think it'd be a bad thing to have 3/4 of our defensive backfield perennial pro bowl caliber players.
     
  6. Jets81

    Jets81 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    4,067
    Fine with this, as long as they make a serious run at a top FA O-lineman and draft a DT and or a DE/OLB (Gholston) in the first 2 rounds. It doesn't cover all the basis, but it touches on some of the biggest problems. Gotta believe that Mangini knows what he needs to do at this point.
     
    #6 Jets81, Jan 29, 2008
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2008
  7. mcmagic

    mcmagic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who exactly is going to blitz and have a chance in hell of getting there?
     
  8. mcmagic

    mcmagic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    The biggest way to compete with NE is to be able to answer their score for score. The Jets offense is an embarrassment right now. It's not even in the same league.
     
  9. I suppose we can assume(and pray to the football gods) that we plan on addressing the other pressing needs along w/ signing Samuel.

    Ya gotta admit..a secondary that includes Revis, Rhodes and Samuel w/ an even SLIGHTLY better pass rush...is quite the asset to build our team around long term.
     
  10. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    wtf is Mangini doing? Doesnt he know we can get the same effect by adding a good pass rush, which ultimately would likely cost us less...

    pass rush, no Samuel > no pass rush, Samuel...
     
  11. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Vernon Gholston my friend...

    If we draft Gholston at 6 and sign Samuel...we are looking at a top 10 defense next season.
     
  12. I hate to clog up this thread, but another thing to keep in mind is the following...

    Mangini comes from the Parcells/BB tree. One thing we know about both of them is they love to bring in "their" guys, regardless of need or position. Love the philosophy or hate it....this could be a prime example.

    We're talking about a top 10 corner, whom our head coach knows very well and had a hand in his development..who added to our already very good secondary...would make it a very scary unit. One that could indeed go head to head w/ the Pats passing game(assuming the pass rush is improved). And likely already knows the system and mangini's core values.
     
  13. mcmagic

    mcmagic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no doubt of that fact. However the fact that our offense is completely inept will sink the team no matter how good the D is.
     
  14. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    You really think if the Jets were going after Samuel they would tell the media? We would all love Samuel but the bottom line is that the Jets have to use all of their resources this offseason to fix the LG and RT spot. And to find pass rushers who can actually beat someone one on one. I would draft another cornerback mid rounds to develop. We also don't know if Samuel is that great or if he's just a product of the system. He's obviously an above average corner but he's not going to be worth a Nate Clemens contract.
     
  15. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    Absolutely get him if he's available, then work on the line and this D is set.
     
  16. allan1

    allan1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,840
    Likes Received:
    13
    Our offense is not completely inept. We have 2 very good receivers, we have a good receiving tight end. We have a #1 back and and good third down back.

    All we need to do is shore up the line and you have a football team who can move the ball. I'm convinced Chad or Kellen, whoever wins out at TC, will do very well behind even an average line.
     
  17. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,000
    Likes Received:
    25,076
    Rumors like this before the Super Bowl, involving our FO, mean less than a fart in a hurricane.
     
  18. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    After Samuel Drains the Cap along with all the "in their prime" Guards and Nose Tackles we want to sign, how much money will we have left to pay a #6 overall pick and 6 other guys, not to mention re-signing players that have expired contracts?

    Let another team hurt the pats by signing him and go after someone who will not want 75M over 5 years.

    And how many times have we seen a player get his money elsewhere and have bad seasons- knowing this franchise it may happen.
     
  19. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I don't want Samuel. He's not going to be worth the money.
     
  20. Joe Willie White Shoes

    Joe Willie White Shoes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    8,145
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    You could have Deion Sanders, and Night Train Lane at CB, but without a pass rush, we'd be calling both of them "toast." What a waste of cap money.
     

Share This Page