Interesting thought...

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by KurtTheJetsFan, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. If we're on the board at 6 and are staring at DMAC and Ryan at the top of our board...there is a very interesting scenario that we could consider:

    If Balty wants to move up from 8 to grab Ryan, we could legitimately move down 2 spots, grab 2-3 more picks from them and STILL get McFadden! Now if DMAC is really our guy, do we take the chance that our most hated rival passes on him at # 7? I'm not sure...but once DMAC gets past the raiders, if he gets passed us and the Pats, he likely falls to at least #10 where Cincy picks.

    Could you imagine us moving down, acquiring more picks, saving a ton of money and STILL getting arguably the best player in the draft?!

    Just somethin to think about..
     
  2. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Won't happen. I would think NE will pick up McFadden in a heartbeat. They had a hard time moving the ball on the ground and Maroney was hindered by injuries. If they pick up DMC, there will be scary times for the Jets and the league for the coming years.
     
  3. The only thing is they have SOOO many glaring needs on D and are so close to another SB....they maybe forced to put need over value.
     
  4. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    896
    I don't know if the Pats would draft McFadden, but you can be assured they will trade the pick to a team who will draft McFadden and pick up a few extra picks as well.
     
  5. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly what I was thinking. There are a few good CBs you can find even in the middle of the first round. Im pretty sure they will trade down with Cincy, pick up probably another second rounder or equivalent, and get more help on the D. Moroney is decent and thats about all NE needs with their fierce passing attack. With DMAC in the mix, their threat will be then divided, so I dont really see why you would wanna divide arguably the best threat in the NFL.
     
  6. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ahh the dreaded "divided threat", an oft-overlooked part of offensive gameplanning by FO and CS types alike. It should not to be confused with the "balanced attack".
     
  7. LI JET FAN

    LI JET FAN New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    2,286
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be a gutsy move by Tannenbaum to pass on Mcfadden if he was the BAP at 6. His NFL career as a GM could end right there or he could be inducted in to the HOF 25 yrs from now.
     
  8. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    You get this by doubling down.
     
  9. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    I think if McFadden is on the board at 6 and he is the only one of the 4 players who could help the team immediately, then the Jets will break the all time record getting their pick up to the podium...but that's just me.

    I think it might get real interesting if Gholston and McFadden are there. Then I think they try to trade down 2 or 3 spots and still hope to get one of them. Could be in that scenario they can cash in on a ton of extra compensation because of a bidding war.
     
    #9 Don, Apr 14, 2008
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2008
  10. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    you got that right.oh yeah, almost forgot. FUCK THE PATRIOTS!!!!!
     
  11. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    It really depends on thier evaluation of Dmac. Can he be an every down back in the NFL? Or is he a bigger version of Reggie Bush an extreme talent that lacks power to grind down defenses late in games?

    If teams think he is an every down back with power and speed to spare, I doubt he even lasts to 6 let alone past the pats at 7. If they feel he is more the second option, it may be possible.

    I think trading out for a team that wants Ryan though, ou have to go lower than 8. If Ryan and Dmac are there at 6, Baltimore can wait for Rayn to come to them if we are not taking him. The Pats will not grab him at 7. That kinda blows up the senario for the OP.
     
  12. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    896
    If Gholston and McFadden are there and we trade down 2 spots we would get neither player.

    Scenario A-We trade the No. 6 pick to a team that drafts McFadden. Then NE would draft Gholston

    Scenario B- We trade the No. 6 pick to a team that drafts Gholston. Then NE would trade the No. 7 pick to a team that drafts McFadden.
     
  13. flgreen

    flgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of course this is the key. Not only with Dmac, but every other player in the draft.

    For all we know most of the GM's in the league might be looking at McFadden, and all they are seeing is a fumble waiting to happen. Or they might all be looking at him and think there isn't enough hype, (that would be hard to believe).

    Most of us have all seen the the "highlights tape" of McFadden, or any other player, but haven't pawed over every snap he has taken, as the talent guys in the NFL do.

    Remember that safty the Jets signed last year. The "Fire Dancer". I saw a highlight tape of him, probably put together by his agent, and said WOW, this guy is going to be an All Pro. He didn't make it out of camp.

    This is all fun, but few of us are qualified to take it all to serious.

    As Harpua said above, "It really depends on thier evaluation "
     
  14. kennyo07

    kennyo07 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    nope, you are thinking too narrow. It would not be NE at #7 that I would be worried about picking up DMAC. If we traded with Baltimore (who takes Ryan) and we get their #8 either Chicago, Carolina or another team like Cincy will jump up to #7 in a heartbeat to take DMAC.

    I just cant understand why Jets fans are not happy with T Jones, L Washington and J Chatman at RB. We are solid at RB. Go Gholston or trade down.

    WE NEED A PASS RUSHER, CB AND WR FAR MORE THAN A RB. There will be a new crop of RB's to come out next year as well. Adrian Peterson last year, Reggie Bush year before that.....and both of those guys are way better than DMAC...escpecially AP.
     
  15. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311

    no doubt. In my limited viewing (two total games) I did not see Dmac lowering his shoulder and making the Defensers pay. Thats what I like in a back. Someone who can run by you or run your ass over. I didn't see it in him, so am down on him as a number 6 pick. I could be completely wrong. Its hard to tell with a limited viewing.
     
  16. inSANITy

    inSANITy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    stupid thread
     
  17. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    It was made much better by your truely enlightening post. Thanks for your great input. I can't wait for more. :rofl:
     
  18. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,032
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    this is the worst post i have seen on here today. classless and useless, judging by the responses it appears that it is a post that is garnering interest therefore it cannot be stupid.

    just because you dont like the post doesnt mean you need to come in and call it stuipid.
     
  19. johnnysd

    johnnysd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,387
    Likes Received:
    158
    I just do not see us drafting McFadden under any circumstance. We will work a trade or pick a CB.
     
  20. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    That's why I said "hope" but the possibility of a big haul may overpower the risk.
     

Share This Page