Bobby Carpenter or Nick Mangold?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by green27, Apr 24, 2006.

  1. green27

    green27 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    0
    You guys have me wanting them both if they are there at our second pick. But I hesitate on carpenter because reading the other day he is coming off I (think a knee injury/ not really sure if that was correct). But the question I have to you guys is would you spend the 2nd first rounder on him or go with mangold...saying that we didn't pick D-brick with the 4th.
     
  2. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    Bobby Carpenter, great 3-4 OLB...

    I think that the signing of Teague shows that the Jets have faith in Norm Katnik, but they may feel that he needs another year or two to learn the position better
     
  3. Big Derty

    Big Derty Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    14
    I think we have to take Mangold hands down if they are both there. Center is aposition of far greater need then OLB
     
  4. Spike_D

    Spike_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    19
    Mangold ... not even a thought. Solidify the interior of your line for the next 10 years.
     
  5. kinghenry89

    kinghenry89 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,052
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's hard to read the signing of Teague. You could be right but it also very well may turn out that the Jets brass intended to draft Mangold from the beginning and the Teague signing showed that they don't have faith in Katnik, even as a backup.

    I would pick Mangold with the #29 and hope that Carpenter falls to #35. My reasoning: If we don't draft Carpenter we can hopefully land a Thomas Howard in the 2nd round, or just go into the season with our current linebackers (which would not be awful.) If we don't draft Mangold there is no other really good center prospect, and we cannot go into the season with Teague at center if we want to win (unless the rest of the line is greatly upgraded.)
     
  6. BonScott

    BonScott Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    79
    i would love carpenter in green but the o line needs serious help. the teague signing feels odd. i dont remember being intimidated by buffalos line
     
  7. BIG TYMER

    BIG TYMER Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Carpenter, as dwalsh said he's a great 3-4 OLB.


    We already signed Trey Teague and have two young guys with upside (Missant and Katnik).
     
  8. Nesquik

    Nesquik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    398
    We will get both mangold at 29 and carpenter at 35
     
    #8 Nesquik, Apr 24, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 3, 2005
  9. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    :breakdance: I would be elated if it ended up like that :breakdance:

    EDIT: I just realized that Mangold and Hawk were roomates in college.....how weird would it be not only if we had the two of them on the team, but also Carpenter playing the other OLB...
     
    #9 MobiusOne28, Apr 24, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2006
  10. vilmaisabeast

    vilmaisabeast New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
  11. JetTalk

    JetTalk New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mangold, I just don't think Carpenter will be a good pro.
     
  12. k.Rhodes25

    k.Rhodes25 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    neither.....lawson or kameron wimbley at 29 and eric winston at 35
     
  13. APK 8

    APK 8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,923
    Likes Received:
    171
    Carpenter.
     
  14. phatnols

    phatnols Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    12
    If Lawson or Wimbley fell to us at 29. I wouldbe estatic.
     
  15. Spike_D

    Spike_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    19
    So we should take the fourth or fifth best OLB in the draft over the #1 Center in the draft. We have to look at the value of the pick. Carpenter could very well be a good pro. But in Mangold you have the best talent at his postition in the draft.

    Everyone keeps talking about BPA ... well folks ... at #29 if he is still there ... BPA is Mangold.
     
  16. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    Didn't we already have a Bobby (Rob) Carpenter?
    I believed he was a WR who was the #2 to Rob Moore.

    eh, Just alil sumfin for the Youngins :wink:
     
  17. Imagesrdecieving

    Imagesrdecieving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    902
    Neither. I want Winston @ 29. If either Carpenter or Mangold fall to 35(doubt it) then so be it.
     
  18. King Koopa

    King Koopa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,425
    Likes Received:
    3,054
    hey man i remember us arguing a while back....but i have to admit, you make a great point about mangold here....my first thoughts were def. carpneter, but you make a point about how mangold is the only GREAT center prsopect in the draft....that pretty much got me thinking hard about this one....i would say it's a very tough call
     
  19. King Koopa

    King Koopa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,425
    Likes Received:
    3,054
    hate to double post, but def. agree with this post 100%.....lawson or wimbley lasting till 29 would be so great for us, we would have to take them....and then yes, winston, mcneil, or mangold at 35
     

Share This Page