Possibility of a 4 Man Front

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by RexontheBeach, Jul 8, 2014.

  1. RexontheBeach

    RexontheBeach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    279
    We all know that the starters on the line this year will be Mo, Snacks, and Richardson. It's hard to argue any different but let's look at a different perspective.

    Kenrick Ellis played very well last year when given the opportunity and proved to be a viable run stopper. He also showed the ability to apply pressure on the QB in passing scenarios.

    Do you think we could see a 4 man front on early downs that includes Ellis and snacks on the inside? Moreover, do you believe this could be effective? Would we have to drop a safety or a LB?

    I think this combination could be very effective on obvious run downs as well as short conversion plays, especially if our safety play improves.

    EDIT: This proposed personnel grouping is not meant to replace Rex's base 3-4.
     
    #1 RexontheBeach, Jul 8, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2014
  2. 74

    74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    This line is athletic and versatile. We're gonna be using any and all kinds of fronts.
     
  3. RexontheBeach

    RexontheBeach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    279
    I just don't recall seeing much of Harrison and Ellis on the field at the same time last year. I think that could be deadly. Let Richardson and Wilk run free occasionally.
     
  4. jetsclaps

    jetsclaps Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    982
    Well no need to worry about it, if Rex thinks having Harrison and Ellis out there at the same time is the best thing for the defense he'll do it.

    You really have to defer to Rex on this matter, us suggesting what defensive packages should be used would be like elementary school students who just learned their multiplication tables offering mathematical suggestions to a calculus teacher.
     
  5. RexontheBeach

    RexontheBeach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    279
    I'm not suggesting or worried about anything, it's all speculation at this point. I was just wondering what people on the message board think. Do you think it'd be a viable option... Why or why not?
     
  6. Borgata

    Borgata Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    34
    If we went with a 4 man front, I think it would be Coples, Wilkerson, Snacks and Richardson.
     
    JETS1116, Big Cat and greenbeanz like this.
  7. RexontheBeach

    RexontheBeach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    279
    I like the sound of that too but it takes away a serviceable coverage LB.
     
  8. 74

    74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    Coples in coverage is like using a Lambo to haul dirt
     
  9. RexontheBeach

    RexontheBeach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    279
    Lol I wouldn't call that serviceable. Although I guess a lambo has the power to do so... He hasn't had much experience in coverage but he has improved since making the switch to the position. I'd say more serviceable than what we have in reserve.
     
    #9 RexontheBeach, Jul 9, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2014
  10. 74

    74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    I'm not saying he's not serviceable in that area, just that his other skills are near elite. He should be in a role where he can rush the passer as much as possible, so I wouldn't worry about not having him in coverage when that happens.
     
    #10 74, Jul 9, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2014
  11. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    He would have to change his last name to Ellison for it to really work though.;)
     
    Big Cat and Jets69 like this.
  12. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,022
    Likes Received:
    25,117
    The only time I'd want to see Harrison and Ellis out there at the same time is for short yardage and goal line sets. And no, Coples is not a coverage linebacker.
     
  13. 74

    74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    It would be like when Dallas had Ware dropping into coverage
     
  14. 101GangGreen101

    101GangGreen101 2018 Thread of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    22,232
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    We ran 4-3 plenty of times last year - but I wouldn't put Ellis and Snacks on the line at the same time.

    Maybe a goal-line stand in a 5-2 defense or goal-line defense
     
  15. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Haha :), I was thinking the exact same thing. Bunch of sons we got on this here line.
     
  16. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    2,304
    I for one do NOT want to see Harrison and Ellis together at the line. No. I don't want that.

    I'd rather prefer to keep one fresh while the other is fielding the NT spot. That way the DL remains effective deep into 4th quarter.
     
    RexontheBeach likes this.
  17. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Somebody brings this up almost every off season. Rex is going to keep switching it up. Some plays we'll see 4 up front, some we'll see 3. It's going to be fun watching teams try to figure it out. There's a LOT of talent up there. The only thing that worries me is that I don't see us possibly being able to retain them all for long as they will command more money.
     
  18. Chad9

    Chad9 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    7
    Which is exactly why you don't overdraft a certain position. Three 1st rounders on the DLine will overload the salary balance for the team if they all perform well. Now throw in a wildcard UDFA Harrison who could go to the pro bowl and you do have a fiscal dilemma. Moving Coples to LB solves a little. This is what Idzik was brought in to handle.
     
  19. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    As for Ellis, I expect Coples will be in on more plays than him. And I doubt we see much of Ellis and Harrison at the same time. Some, maybe.
     
  20. jetsclaps

    jetsclaps Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    982
    These are good problems to have.
     

Share This Page