Pryor was the Better pick over Brandin Cooks

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Jetsruby, Aug 9, 2014.

  1. themorey

    themorey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    1,791
    Pryor seems like a perfect fit for the D but I'll have to wait til he plays. I think Cooks was a perfect fit for the WCO too. The dude is not only fast but quick as shot (unlike Hill who is fast but not quick). Marty would have done a lot with Cooks although he should really shine in NO.
     
  2. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    And that's why drugs will never be completely legalized. You are crazy stoned.
     
  3. milo

    milo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    291
    I REALLY wanted Cooks, but it became more and more apparent in the weeks leading up to the draft that something had to be done about the back end. I was a little annoyed at first, but pretty quickly after thinking what Pryor could do for us I was fine with it.

    Had Idzik not struck out in free agency on a corner, I think I would have been more upset to pass on a guy like that (who Brees is gonna turn into a star), but all in all it worked out for everybody.
     
  4. Jetsruby

    Jetsruby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    936
    A bunch of other people don't think so. Either we're all stoned...or u are.
     
  5. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,000
    Likes Received:
    25,074
    I had been in favor of Cooks and another couple of prospects at WR in the first, but in the couple of weeks leading up to the draft I really started liking the idea of safety, although the guy I had in mind was Fuller.

    Still, Pryor was a very sold product and I'm not going to let my personal preference for a fucking draft pick have me sour graping the FO after one preseason game, no matter how many YouTube highlight videos I watched.
     
  6. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    the season will tell.
     
  7. Jetsruby

    Jetsruby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    936
    That comment doesn't make ANY sense. If you read what I had to say..>I said that the way it turned out didn't matter. Brandin Cooks could turn out to be a 5 time pro bowler. I am saying the Actual Pick was better. Based on the Jets situation and with what each player showed pre-draft...they made the right decision/gamble.
     
  8. plasticsloth

    plasticsloth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    126
    It was certainly a surprise. I agree I think it was a better fit for the team however I think Cooks was the better player overall. This goes back to need vs BPA. This past draft in general was surprising after seeing the 2013 draft. They really went after needs especially with the Amaro pick.

    I think the better question to ask is should the Jets have taken Clinton Dix over Pryor? Personally I would've preferred Clinton Dix as he looked stronger in coverage. I wasn't impressed with Pryor's highlight reel. He just doesn't seem to play smart and goes for big hits as opposed to solid tackles. From what I saw he tends to overrun a lot of plays but hopefully he gets this out of his system with some coaching.

    I was just disappointed that CJ Mosley and Zack Martin were gone by the time of the Jets picked. I would've loved either one of those guys.
     
  9. nyjetsknicks247

    nyjetsknicks247 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    936
    I wanted Cooks all off season leading up to the draft

    Didn't think pryor was going to drop to 18 but once he did I was on board with taking him over cooks
     
  10. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,225
    Likes Received:
    6,090
    A defense is MUCH harder to staff than an offense.

    A stout defense requires all 11 players to be above avg. A single glaring weakness (Patterson?) can derail the entire defense.

    Rex has far too much money and talent invested in the front 7 to throw it all away over a weak secondary.If you're not sure, go back and look at the nightmare pic talisaynon posted on page one.
     
  11. plasticsloth

    plasticsloth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    126
    You've clearly never watched the 49ers. Their secondary is atrocious but their front seven is so good that it covers it up. Saying a defense is harder to staff than an offense is just completely wrong. If that were the case the Jets wouldn't have such a crap offense. Both sides of the ball can be derailed by a glaring weakness in combination with poor coaching.
     
  12. Faux machine

    Faux machine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,834
    Likes Received:
    2,116
    Wes WelkerBroncos$6,000,000
    Reggie WayneColts$5,833,333
    Jeremy MaclinEagles$5,500,000
    Michael Crabtree49ers$5,333,333
    Nate WashingtonTitans$4,466,667
    Hakeem NicksColts$4,000,000
    Eddie RoyalChargers$3,500,000
    Demaryius ThomasBroncos$2,830,100
    Dez BryantCowboys$2,362,100
    Matt SlaterPatriots$2,000,000
    Miles AustinBrowns$2,000,000
    Kenny BrittRams$1,400,000
    Dane SanzenbacherBengals$1,200,000
    Brad SmithEagles$1,150,000
    Jason AvantPanthers$1,050,000
    Brandon TateBengals$1,024,000
    Nate BurlesonBrowns$1,020,000
    Santana MossRedskins$1,020,000
    Brandon Lloyd49ers$1,005,000

    Unrestricted free agent wide receivers 2015
     
  13. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,430
    Likes Received:
    7,374
    I find it a bit disconcerting that the 2 obvious areas (CB & WR) I felt needed to be addressed after the end of last season are 2 of the question marks in training camp. On the bright side looks like we are very deep at safety and TE. Watch out NFL!
     
  14. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,000
    Likes Received:
    25,074
    Just saying.
     
  15. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,430
    Likes Received:
    7,374
  16. DJ WOO Child

    DJ WOO Child New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    9
     
  17. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,225
    Likes Received:
    6,090
    WR was addressed with Decker. DB was addressed with rookies (Pryor/McDougle). So we won't really know if things have been 'really fixed' until the Rooks take the field and show us what they got.
     
  18. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I agree with the OP. An impact safety is always more valuable than an impact WR because the safety sits right in the middle of your defense and effects every pass play that is run. They effect a significant percentage of run plays also. The wide receiver maybe effects 15-20 plays a game depending on the offensive scheme and his skill level.

    This, BTW, is why great safeties consistently play in the Super Bowl and great WR's rarely do.
     
  19. Bellows1

    Bellows1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,526
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    Neither of these arguments suggests taking one rookie over the other is a better option. If safety is so important, signing a proven FA would seem to be the best option, while surrounding your young struggling QB with the most offensive talent in the draft.

    The best WR in the draft generally go early...to bad teams. Their not having many SB appearances lends itself to the team as a whole is not very good, nothing to do with their contribution to the game.

    I'd also say there have been some pretty good receivers in the SB every year.
     
  20. RubenDias

    RubenDias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    432
    Imo the Problem with WR is that you can be taken out of a game ( even tho not completly if you CJ or Dez) but it can have a significant impact on your performance , a Safety can be a game changer with the right skillset in many ways ,there is a reason that people refer to Qb of the defense and as last line of defense one of the 2 safetys at least will be unblocked giving the oportunity to shine on both Pass and Run Defense. Cutting it short your performance on the field cant be hidden by other teams gameplan.
     

Share This Page