What could the Jets have done better this year

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JUNJOBX2199, Jan 12, 2007.

  1. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    I?m real happy the way things turned out this year. I just wondering whether anyone has any sore spot they noticed this year. For me I felt frustrated by the inability to open up holes on the line for the run game, I did see some hole's open up during Games, which Leon just simply missed. I also think running back was another sore spot. Barlow was thought to be better then he actually was or did the line not open up those lanes that a runner like Barlow would need. I do realize that this o-line was young with two rookies and mainly concentrating on keeping Chad upright. :eek:fftopic: And what is going to happen to Trey Teague when he?s healthy.
     
  2. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    The Jets won more games that I thought reasonably possible at the beginning of the season. They rushed for more yards with more TD's and fewer fumbles than I thought reasonably possible given Martin's absence. They gave up fewer sacks and kept Chad alive for longer than I thought reasonably possible.

    I just can't see where the Jets could have done anything better given the talent on hand and the move to a new system on both sides of the ball.
     
  3. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    The Jets could not have done much better in the draft. There aren't any picks that look especially bad, although the only ones that were definitely, without question, good were Mangold and Leon. I'll give Tanginibaum the benefit of the doubt on free agency signings - I like Dyson and don't really understand the salary cap enough to judge. Coaching could not have been better except that maybe they could have mixed in a little 4-3, as they are better built for that. But that might have been too confusing for the players who need to learn the 3-4 system.
     
  4. IIMeanDeanII

    IIMeanDeanII Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,830
    Likes Received:
    7,413
    Mixing 3-4 & 4-3 last season would have helped us out a lot more last season. We were more built around a 4-3, but this is only because we have players that were brought here for that scheme. It would not be beneficial to these players that will remain here next season in the 3-4 though, and I think they did the right thing by sticking mainly too 3-4. It is also really impressive on how well our players converted to a 3-4 scheme (Vilma, Robertson, etc.)in such a short amount of time, and this will be a VERY good thing for us as fans next season. IMO

    The main thing that really got under my skin was our blitzing schemes. They were creative in mid-season, but were picked up well towards the end of the season. I dont know if this was due to the players, or just the schemes in general, but I hope for more variety come next season.
     
  5. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was blown away at the chances that Mangini took during the year and extreamly happy to see B Shottenhiemer's offense wasnt the lay down and die type from the hackett era!
     
  6. xjets2002x

    xjets2002x Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,814
    Likes Received:
    17
    1.Used Brad Smith a bit more downfield
    2.Blitzed more earlier in the season
    3.Used Leon Washington earlier in the season

    That's about it. The rest is personnel related. I can't complain about 10-6.

    -X-
     
  7. FreemanMcNeil24

    FreemanMcNeil24 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    i mean they coulda done better in alot of areas...but still i was very happy with our season...seeing how everyone thought we were gonna suck
     
  8. rajensen088

    rajensen088 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    A 10 -6 record with a cupcake schedule ( one win vs teams with a winning record) moving players all over the field, running trick plays with smoke and mirrors produced an awful 26th ranked offense:

    http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/OFF-TOTAL/2006/regular?sort_col_1=4
     
  9. Mantana Soss

    Mantana Soss Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    9,480
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ah, the Joker's back. Had no ammo for the last 3 months, eh?
     
  10. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393


    However, they produced only 16 yards less offense per game, and Held the ball longer, then Herms new tribe, which has Tony Gonzalez, Larry Johnson, and a Veteran O/L....

    And you are evaluating Cream Pufff schedule wrong. Look at the defenses faced. 8 of those games were against top 10 defenses....(ne,2, mia, 2, jax, minn, chi, oak...)
     
    #10 Hobbes3259, Jan 12, 2007
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2007
  11. Dierking

    Dierking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    16,915
    Likes Received:
    16,072
    They could have won the super bowl. Anything short of that cannot be considered success. Just ask Matt Millen.
     
  12. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
    The pats schedule was weaker. So was the Saints and the Bears. The Bears actually played the weakest schedule in the NFL..
     
  13. NYJalltheway

    NYJalltheway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,436
    Likes Received:
    2,525
    Yeah, and everyone knows they're one of the worst #1 seeds ever...but they get lucky this week with a terrible Hawks team. THEN the Eagles/Saints will destroy them....hee heee I'm excited I hate the Bears so much
     
  14. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
  15. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hope your paying attention to everyone’s response to your post, your theory is blow out the water and your timely arrival back on the board is not appreciated. What team do you really root for? Let me guess 49er's in the 70-to 80's Cowboys in the 90's and probably the pat's in the in the new millennium.
     
  16. NYJalltheway

    NYJalltheway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,436
    Likes Received:
    2,525
    He probably wasn't alive for most of what you said
     
  17. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    was going to add something like that but I thought he's not worth it!:smile:
     
  18. DevTeam

    DevTeam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    70
    what could the jets have done better? Not much.
     
  19. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,043
    Likes Received:
    25,150
  20. All Star

    All Star Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    0
    1: I wanted Brad Smith to throw a pass this year.
    2: Chad threw too many picks
    3: Wanted Chris Bake more invloved in the pass game.
    4: Mix in some 4-3 to change it up.
     

Share This Page