Sorry if already posted. http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football/ffl/2007draftkit/story?id=2947630
When will the last "Expert" notice, that Rhodes is a FS?!? Clement is OK, he?s not great, but he gets the Job done and short time, i can life with him. Moore is far from being adequate, he was just terrible last year.
They have to start saying losses instead of "Key Losses". The NFL network and ESPN do the same thing. IMO there were no "key losses", to be honest there was not even a loss. We are a better team without Blaylock, Barlow, Askew, and Ramsey.
Safeties in the Jets defensive system are divided into left and right, not really strong and free. Both Rhodes and Peters said this in an interview during minicamp and described how they like it better. I've seen plenty of plays last season where Rhodes played in the strong safety position.
Is it really that big of a deal if the writer types that he's a strong safety instead of a free safety. They are virtually interchangeable in our defense and he's still a safety whichever way you look at it. I think this guy is in for a big surprise with our defense. From the sounds of this article, buddy is expecting an improved offense and leaky defense from our club next season, but I think it will be the other way around.
If these are "key losses," then so is Herm Edwards. Good Christ, doesn't anyone knowledgable write anymore?
i think its possible that by the end of the year cotch could end up first on the depth chart for WRs.....
ya i think he gets like 1100 yards, and like a lot of TD's...........he's gonna become #1......................
................how many TDs is "like a lot"?............ is it the number of periods you used in your post?
he gets money for this. Imo you could at least expect, that he looks up the players positions he writes about!