Jets Team Preview

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Force, Jul 25, 2007.

  1. Force

    Force New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry if already posted.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football/ffl/2007draftkit/story?id=2947630

     
  2. German Jets Fan

    German Jets Fan 2007 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,949
    Likes Received:
    7
    When will the last "Expert" notice, that Rhodes is a FS?!?

    Clement is OK, he?s not great, but he gets the Job done and short time, i can life with him. Moore is far from being adequate, he was just terrible last year.
     
  3. KOZ

    KOZ Totally Addicted

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    7,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    The article lost all credibility when Ramsey, Barlow and Blaylock were listed as "key losses"
     
  4. TheGreenBrickRhode

    TheGreenBrickRhode New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    They have to start saying losses instead of "Key Losses". The NFL network and ESPN do the same thing. IMO there were no "key losses", to be honest there was not even a loss. We are a better team without Blaylock, Barlow, Askew, and Ramsey.
     
  5. GreenHornet

    GreenHornet New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,380
    Likes Received:
    1
    I second that motion. In fact, sending them packing were "key wins".
     
  6. FITM

    FITM 2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    Safeties in the Jets defensive system are divided into left and right, not really strong and free. Both Rhodes and Peters said this in an interview during minicamp and described how they like it better.

    I've seen plenty of plays last season where Rhodes played in the strong safety position.
     
  7. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Is it really that big of a deal if the writer types that he's a strong safety instead of a free safety. They are virtually interchangeable in our defense and he's still a safety whichever way you look at it.

    I think this guy is in for a big surprise with our defense. From the sounds of this article, buddy is expecting an improved offense and leaky defense from our club next season, but I think it will be the other way around.
     
  8. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    If these are "key losses," then so is Herm Edwards. Good Christ, doesn't anyone knowledgable write anymore?
     
  9. The Uniform Bomber

    The Uniform Bomber Spivey's Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    177

    completely agree.



    cheers
     
  10. KOWIE

    KOWIE Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think its possible that by the end of the year cotch could end up first on the depth chart for WRs.....
     
  11. CurtisMartin 28

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    ya i think he gets like 1100 yards, and like a lot of TD's...........he's gonna become #1......................
     
  12. Mr Electric

    Mr Electric Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,362
    Likes Received:
    1

    ................how many TDs is "like a lot"?............ is it the number of periods you used in your post?
     
  13. German Jets Fan

    German Jets Fan 2007 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,949
    Likes Received:
    7
    he gets money for this. Imo you could at least expect, that he looks up the players positions he writes about!
     
  14. Force

    Force New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rofl:

    That would qualify as "like a lot."
     

Share This Page