Bonds Failed a Drug Test in Nov. 2001

Discussion in 'Baseball Forum' started by MParty7441, Feb 14, 2008.

  1. MParty7441

    MParty7441 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    6,251
    Likes Received:
    73
  2. MParty7441

    MParty7441 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    6,251
    Likes Received:
    73
    SAN FRANCISCO -- Barry Bonds tested positive for steroids in November 2001, just a month after hitting his record 73rd home run of the season, U.S. prosecutors said on Thursday.

    The allegation came in a legal filing in his steroid perjury case that referred to Bonds' long-time trainer, Greg Anderson.

    "At trial, the government's evidence will show that Bonds received steroids from Anderson in the period before the November 2001 positive drug test, and that evidence raises the inference that Anderson gave Bonds the steroids that caused him to test positive in November 2001," U.S. Attorney Joseph Russoniello wrote.

    The U.S. government made the assertion in a document that asked a federal court to reject Bonds' motion last month to dismiss the charges that he lied about past steroid use.

    In December, the record seven-time National League Most Valuable Player pleaded not guilty to lying to a federal grand jury in 2003 when he denied using performance-enhancing drugs.

    He testified in the BALCO sports steroid case, which ended up jailing his personal trainer, Anderson, and the head of the BALCO lab near San Francisco.

    The latest government motion also referred to a question by a prosecutor during the BALCO case to "determine why Bonds apparently tested positive for anabolic steroids in November 2000."

    To date, prosecutors have revealed little about the details they have in the case against Bonds, the greatest hitter of his era long dogged by suspicions about doping.
     
  3. macbk

    macbk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    18,367
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    :beer: (filler)
     
  4. Dierking

    Dierking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    16,918
    Likes Received:
    16,074
    Say it ain't so.
     
  5. FlashGordon

    FlashGordon Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    7
    I'm pretty sure it was just flaxseed oil.
     
  6. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,579
    My guess is that this was strategically released today to make people forget about what a piss poor job the house did yesterday with Roger Clemens commiting perjury before our very eyes. Yet such honorable men like Dan Burton allowed it to happen.
     
  7. dubagedi

    dubagedi New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,352
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the best strategy for Bonds right now would be to pretend his eyes see differently from everyone else. When the prosecutor holds up some sort of document that references to and proves that Bonds knowingly took steroids, the best strategy would to just keep saying "no that says flaxseed oil. no it doesn't say steroids. no that isn't a syringe with my dna on it and traces of steroids, that is a 10 foot dido i bought for my mistress, etc."

    He really can't really put himself in a worse situation that what he's in now.
     
  8. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    The report is incorrect. He failed it in 2000. 2001 was just a typo.
     
  9. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Being a young, uninformed, moderately baked Canadian would someone kindly explain to me why we are just hearing about this NOW..............
     

Share This Page