Separate names with a comma.
It could or it couldn't. Hope that helps. :beer: It really depends on the deal that is made in the trade between the Jets and the trading...
They just talked to the chick covering the Jets, and she didn't say anything about it. Revis still a Jet, is what she said.
I am just writing what they said. "one report says Jets might have deal in place" I just rewound it since they are talking about the Brown's...
IDK, The cliffhanger was, one source now saying Jets have trade in place.
NFL Network: Just stated Deal in place. It was a cliff hanger, and I will update if they say anything more.
My all time favorite move. Jenkins was a center piece of our defense, and was the most dominate when he played. Unfortunate knee injury, that...
I meant with in the 1 - 10 yard and behind the line of scrimmage parameters. I have never seen a quarterback throw so many check down...
Well congrats guys, I'm an idiot. You might want to do a little research into eggcorns.
It will be terminated for the Jets, and become the responsibility of the trading partner.
I just re-edited, and taken straight from the CBA
The June 1 designation wouldn't come into play in this case. The most likely scenario is that the trading partner will sign Revis to a long term...
I haven't looked it up, but I don't see the difference. Edit: http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Dead-money-disasters.html ReEdit:...
Predictable, could still sign him back
Did you look at the Roster for Jax in 2010? http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/jax/2010.htm
How many interceptions?
fixed it for you, Foles would just be a bonus.
No first or second, which is why they are my dark horse.
Washington is my dark horse, they just got rid of Hall. I don't know how it would look though.
I can't see the eagles giving up #4 though, which means we dont get a first this year.
NP, :beer:
