Jets may target CB, TE

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by jcjet, Mar 28, 2007.

  1. Borgata

    Borgata Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    34
    I really want Blaylock, I want to see our OL just destroy others. An awesome Oline can make everyone look awesome just look at the Chief's oline all those years.
     
  2. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,431
    Likes Received:
    7,374
    Can you post the article on the misinformation the FO/CS has already provided through the press in one year of management? I think I missed it, and that is something I would like to read.
     
  3. KOZ

    KOZ Totally Addicted

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    7,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be a Boobway/Germ thing to do, going for a TE.

    This regime realizes that without the right side of the OL solidified, you could have Gates on one side and Crumpler on the other side, and teams will still crush you.

    Blaylock or best available OG/OT, if you'd please....
     
  4. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    No TE please, I'm satisfied with chris baker. Our needs are DT, CB, LB, OG. I feel we must go either DT or CB at #25. And use the rest of our day one picks on our other needs.
     
  5. The Uniform Bomber

    The Uniform Bomber Spivey's Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    177
    http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft07/insider/columns/story?columnist=mcshay_todd&id=2814195

    this is from Todd McShay's mock draft. i don't think i agree with this selection, but Olsen would be a nice weapon to have. i still think we should go with BPA at WR/OLB/OL/CB.



    cheers
     
  6. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,048
    Likes Received:
    25,153
    I wasn't trying to be a wiseass, but since you so obviously are, why don't you try looking at our weekly injury reports for 2006, or maybe the flood of Jets articles concerning the interest we had in Cutler last year, smart guy.

    Edit: I almost forgot about this:
    http://forums.theganggreen.com/showthread.php?t=5374&highlight=cutler
     
    #46 abyzmul, Mar 29, 2007
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2007
  7. MAJORPAYNE

    MAJORPAYNE New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    With what this team has put together from last years draft and free agency I cannot expect anything less than a opening day starter with our 1st round pick no DEPTH PLAYERS.
     
  8. soh_vet

    soh_vet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    206
    I don't see us taking a TE. Didn't we sign C. Baker to a handsome contract? I don't see dumping another chunk at that position. And it would mean someone is prolly getting cut, not Dearth (snapper), prolly not Posciak (last yr pick), most likely Sean Ryan (posciak takes his spot). I don't know much about Olsen, can he block? Or is he the Winslow / Shockey Miami TE mold?
     
  9. SigmaXJet

    SigmaXJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    2
    why is everyone so satisfied with baker? wow 31 catches for 300 yards in an offense that threw short passes all year! if he was such a receiving threat why wasn't he thrown the ball more? its not like chad was heaving the ball 40 yards down the field often to WRs.
     
  10. JETFIGHTERS

    JETFIGHTERS Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,942
    Likes Received:
    8
    We really NEED a BIG DT for our defense to be what it can be with the new additions we have in FA. I really think this is what they have in mind, the FA LBs and DEs are pieces but a BIG DT with those pieces will make for a solid defense. Think about it,we won't need stunts and rushers in trick formations to be effective, just heavy rotation.
     
  11. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    It's not that I'm an unsatisfied customer.. but what if he goes down again this year... are you happy with Pat Ryan, or whatever his name is being our TE? I'm not. How about the ability to throw out of a 2 TE set, where you can send both of them out in a patern, and exploit a mis-match... there is a whole new twist. Lets not all be so short sighted here. TE is a need, weather we think it's as big a need as the front office is immaterial, since they make the picks. :breakdance:

    Ellis
     
  12. addage

    addage New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the FO has worked hard to put themselves in a position where they can go BPA. They should do that even if it means drafting a position I would prefer to wait on.

    Like many here, I want OL, LB, CB--actually NT, but none will be even close to value with our highest picks--but I have faith in Tangini.

    So even if they go with a "skill" player in Rd 1, they'll have a plan on how to use him. And yes, Chad--good QB with below average arm that he is--will be able to execute the game plan.
     
  13. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,431
    Likes Received:
    7,374
    LOL...So that mock draft was an attempt to provide misinformation. I can see it now, Tannebaum and Mangini standing over whoever created that mock draft taking turns dictating picks. I can see it.
     
  14. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,048
    Likes Received:
    25,153
    Way to ignore the rest. My pud is ready to be pulled whenever you are.
     

Share This Page