Redskins trade 3 first round picks to rams for 2nd overall

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by JoeWillie130, Mar 9, 2012.

  1. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,688
    Likes Received:
    5,916
    too simplified. you have to consider why those running QB's don't perform as well as traditional passing QB's which may not be relevant to RG3.

    was it because running ability compensated for a lack of ability that traditional passers posses, such as the ability to read coverages, , leadership, team respect, etc.

    if that is the case, it doesn't mean having an additional skill set -- the ability to run -- decreases your chance to succeed in the NFL and is thus twice an exception.

    any player that possesses those successful traits plus has the ability to run would actually be at an advantage, but just because those traits may be rare doesn't mean you can than reduce RG3 to the type of QB running QB's have been in the past.

    I'm not saying he has those abilities, I'm saying you can't say he is a greater risk to trade up for than Luck because he has that additional ability, which doesn't negate his passing abilities.
     
  2. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Washington being docked cap space makes this trade even funnier. That 2013 first rounder they traded will likely be a top 10 pick.
     
  3. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Washington was already 30 million under the cap..that won't hurt them at all especially since they could spread it over two years..the trade makes more sense now then ever. As somebody wrote it would have cost them even more if it was known how much they would lose from the cap.
     
  4. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    I just read this 5 times and I still don't understand what you're trying to say.
     
  5. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,688
    Likes Received:
    5,916
    are you kidding? having $15 million less to sign players hurts no matter what.
     
  6. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Won't hurt them at all...lol
     
  7. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    This is completely nonsensical. Of course it hurts them.
     
  8. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Apparently they are fighting the decision, claim the NFL approved all of their contracts that year. Should be interesting as FA starts in less than 24.
     
  9. DisgruntledLionFan

    DisgruntledLionFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    148
    There's a lot of smart dudes that had a lot of time to plan this out.

    I can't imagine the reactions are a surprise to the league.

    But do you really want the dirtiest word in professional sports bandied about this much?

    NFL backs down completely or they reduce this heavy fine to nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
     
    #89 DisgruntledLionFan, Mar 12, 2012
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2012
  10. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    It's amazing that the NFL waited until the night before free agency to levy this action against the teams. They had how long to do this and it just pops up now?
     
  11. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah thats pretty fucked up tbh, they must want the Cmen to win the division again
     

Share This Page