Your answer is to take the 6th BPA? I meant a name. Or even a position. You can't just say "since we have the 6th pick, we should take the 6th BPA." Maybe let me know who you think the 6th BPA is. Had you mentioned a name to begin with, I wouldn't have asked the question.
Another copout. No one is asking you to predict who is going to be there, but who you think the Jets should take based on their needs and players that COULD be available. You can do this several ways, you can try to predict who the other 5 teams will take and who will be available. OR you could just say who you want the Jets to take. I will go: 1) Chris Long - I doubt he will be available at 6. 2) Gholston - I think we are going to end up taking him and will be a great player for the defense. 3) McFadden - I just don't like taking RBs so high, but he has great potential. See I even have my predictions in my sig. You go around complaining about the bad evaluation skills of the FO, you say that the Jets fans here are happy with mediocre players. But yet you won't put your name behind anyone. You won't show us any of this great football knowledge that you claim to have. This way no matter who the Jets draft you can come here and say "I told you so." It is a copout, grow a pair and join the discussion, or be quiet. BTW this is a bullshit question that you keep throwing around in an attempt to change the subject and deflect from the fact that you are saying nothing, other than nonstop bitching. Answer the questions that people ask. How about you answer your own question? And none of this "We have to get better talent" crap. WHO do you want to draft? WHO do you want the FO to sign? What changes in the CS would you make? Is there a philosophical problem you have with the CURRENT front office that you would address? How?
Wow, didn't think this thread would turn into a cat fight between Champ and abyzmul... I think it should ALL be addressed too. But is that possible? Seriously, when we have glaring holes at important positions, we need to address that weakness-because every other team will do so when they play us. I don't want to see teams pick on a position like they used to do to "Otis Smith" back in the day-if any of you remember. It isn't that I don't feel depth is important. I KNOW it is. But in our current situation, that would be a luxury to address our O-line depth before tackling the positions I pointed out in my original post. The O-line WILL be addressed, but not until our later picks, and post draft signings.
Yeah he'd say that Chad Henne is worth the 1st overall pick. He is a pussy for not making a prediction.
I stand behind my belief that the Jets should trade down if McFadden is available. We can gain more picks, and add to the depth.
