You must realize that's what everyone does on here, but only two or three others do it as good as Electric. WW85 comes to mind. When a poster is that on point about prospects without being an actual scout, it's impressive no matter how they come across.
About the response I expected. You didn't fall short of what I expected. Don't let these awards on a MB go to yer head. Oh, too late. :shit:
Who's the one letting a message board get to their head? All I said was the TT Forum would make TGG a better site. It was in no way a shot at you. I can't take your seriously. Do everyone a favor and take another "6 month vacation".
I know I defend Electric the most, but you're implying he wasn't like this before this poll or any of the awards.
Oh, come on, the only guy getting truly bent out of shape is the same guy who made a flurry of cockmments about Cromartie when he first signed up <----again, no attack, it happened!
He also started complaining about the site within 10 posts of joining, so take it all with a grain of salt. Let's not blame the thread.
Good to see you tbj. Thanks for the appointment. As per Sundayjack, I have attempted to take pictures of my "junk" ala Favre and send it to her...but Im not very good at it. So far I have a half of testicle and two upper groin shots. You might want to reconsider the appointment. Not sure if its my inept photography or my extreme whiteness below...or lack thereof.
eh, there was Pennington and Favre talk too. :grin: And those who don't like E's attitude seem to always show up. I've never been fazed by it, so I never really understand why people get bent out of shape.
There's ALWAYS Pennington and Favre talk when junc is involved. Just including his name in the poll made the thread in part about Pennington. And people get bent out of shape because Mr. E is just a big meanie.
If it wasn't directed at me, why quote me with no further comment? But, you proved my point here.... you(r) wanting me to take 6 months off? And you speak for "everyone"? Your pride is only surpassed by your ego... on a message board. Both are rather over blown. But, you are young, there is still lots of time to grow up.
Jay, I am sure you can handle the job. You will however be dispatched without delay should you put your junk on a copy machine or in front of a camera. Unless of course, you are actually Brunell's daughter. Then, you would get a "raise".
I can't see polls from my phone but a honorary mention has to go to the JI board. Half of them think they run the team anyway and as a whole they would without a doubt put the fanciest light-footed team together. I mean they're all so rich.
:beer: Nah...not her. A few years ago, before he went bankrupt...that would have been a nice gig. Ok...Im in.
If you go back and read my arguments from the past decade you will find that I was right more often than not despite being viciously attacked by the vocal majority on the board. I am not a follower, I don't regurgitate info I see on espn or base my judgments based on meaningless fantasy #s. I use my eyes, I read many different sources, i watch various programs and I used to watch alot of game tape until real life took over having a family. Let's also not forget that I am not a knee jerk reaction guy, I'm not like most fans who want to fire the coach after bad lsoses or trade guys b/c they had one bad game or a bad season. W/ most fans running the team we'd look like the 80s Yankees. Some people just cannot have fun. Obviously we are all fans and not up for the job and never will be.
Since Cakes is essentially out of the running for the top post I've decided to make him the "Special Assistant to the Traveling Secretary."
So you play along one minute, and then complain about how ridiculous the thread is the next? You're the one who seems to be enjoying this more than anyone here anyway.
Certainly wasn't obsessed with Hughes, but from what I saw, he looked like he could have been a great player. Certainly better than slouch ass Everson Griffen. I actually asked you some pretty legit questions about Hughes that you couldn't answer. Your criticisms of him were similar to that of Rogers Cromartie... that didn't work out too well. "I have a question-- You have said many times Hughes will be a successful 4-3 end, but he is just not suited for 3-4 olb. With the issues you list - bad hands, disappearing against the run, relies on speed, no rush moves, played against bogus right tackles, how does that translate into a good 4-3 end? Those flaws are even MORE detrimental for a 4-3 end becase he is lining up directly in front of a 325lb tackle. If he's not a good player because he's undersized and played weak teams, and relies on his speed, wouldn't you think that playing in space at OLB would be the ONLY way he could succede in the NFL?"
